While humans, signing in their individual capacity, are
fine to delegate their powers to other humans, a POA given from a trust,
corporation, executor, administrator, limited liability company, partnership or similar
"entity" or fiduciary is not favored by the law or the courts. For such reasons, we usually decline to draft
them this way, and try to steer the requesting party to a different solution.
In the case of a corporate entity such as an LLC, corporation,
partnership, etc., the person signing on behalf of that entity has been
entrusted with powers on behalf of the entity. That trust and that appointment to sign on
behalf of that entity is special under the law.
In the case of a corporation, the shareholders had a special meeting to
elect the directors, and the directors then elected the officers, and the
directors may have also had a special board meeting just to choose which
officer can sign for that entity in that particular sale or refinance
transaction. Once appointed by the
decision of the board, a person cannot (generally) just delegate their special
powers to sign on behalf of the corporation (or LLC, or LP) to anyone they
want, just because it's inconvenient for them to sign. They were chosen. If they cannot act, the corporation, through
its board of directors, must pick someone else to sign. So the solution is a new corporate resolution
to pick a new person to act and sign.
Same idea goes for fiduciaries such as trustees,
executors, etc. They are "entrusted," quite literally, to act on
behalf of a trust or an estate, and they can't just delegate their special powers via POA to
anyone they want (generally). The
solution here, if they are unavailable, is to go back to the will or the trust
and see who bats #2 -- trusts and wills often have alternates that can step up
and act, although it may take some court action in the case of a probated
estate.
Notice that I have said "generally" throughout -- sometimes we permit the use of POAs in these situations because we are in a time crunch, or some other similar bind. But that decision and analysis is done on a case by case basis, as it involves a review of "discretionary" vs.
"ministerial" duties of the agent. Sometimes trust agreement will have language that does expressly permit the employment and use of "agents" and attorneys-in-fact to accomplish the wishes and agreements of the original trustee, and there is law in Texas that suggests that if the agent or attorney-in-fact is simply performing the ministerial duty of signing that fiduciary's name to a document, and is not exercising discretion in what is being signed, that such authority might not violate the law or the original powers delegated to the fiduciary or corporate officer.
No comments:
Post a Comment